Traveltalkonline.com Forums



Travel and Vacation Forums >> Afloat

Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)
Carol_HillAdministrator
Administrator


Joined: 08/01/00
Posts: 63331
Loc: Central Florida!
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: DELRAY]
      #1480804 - 02/15/13 09:51 PM (72.59.124.6)

True that it took five days but I just don't know the answer. Apparently, based on what I read on Cruise Critic, ships built after 2010 are required to have redundant power systems, that would avoid a situation like this. Those regs don't apply to older ships though.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PelicanPirate
Traveler


Joined: 08/03/12
Posts: 682
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: Carol_Hill]
      #1480827 - 02/15/13 11:50 PM (107.9.16.124)

I think once at a certain point offshore, one onlyhas to have a macerator to offload the waste. I know the boat I was on actually treats the water to drinkable before turningit back to the ocean.

I would declare this an emergency and if brought to task, pay the fine.

I'm sure there will be some innovative solutions developed to prevent the PR of "bags".

Despite this, I'd take a free cruise to anywhere warm RIGHT NOW!

What if this had been a nude cruise --- that would have doubled the coverage

--------------------
Just the other night I was sleeping under a bridge and now here I am on the grandest ship in the world having champagne with you fine people.
Jack Dawson - Movie Titanic


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ellen777
Traveler


Joined: 02/22/08
Posts: 504
Loc: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: PelicanPirate]
      #1480848 - 02/16/13 08:59 AM (184.0.22.32)

Why could they not bring another cruise ship and tender the passengers and crew to it?
What if this had been a major fire, what would happen then?
Sounds very scary.
Ellen

--------------------
Life's a beach


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Carol_HillAdministrator
Administrator


Joined: 08/01/00
Posts: 63331
Loc: Central Florida!
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: Ellen777]
      #1480850 - 02/16/13 09:08 AM (71.101.41.196)

Ellen--Have you ever tendered from a cruise ship? It can be a very dangerous business, in regular circumstances, when the ship has thruster and stabilizer power to keep it steady. This ship had neither of these. The passengers were in no immediate danger and it was much safer to keep them onboard, versus risking a very dangerous tendering exercise. Five people recently died during a routine tendering. Of course, there are no cruise ships just 'hanging around' either to transfer them to.

IF the ship was in danger of sinking, certainly they would have put them in tenders, but not in this circumstance.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Snorkeller
Traveler


Joined: 05/06/04
Posts: 1038
Loc: Virginia
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: Carol_Hill]
      #1480917 - 02/16/13 11:35 AM (108.4.32.106)

If it became a question of a need based on safety to evacuate the ship, then I think that the life boats would be used to evacuate. Obviously, that would not make anyone happy - if people complained about being trapped on the ship, let them be on a life boat for hours, let alone a day or two. The idea of tendering cruise ship pax between ships in open water (and unless you had access to land based tenders then the life boats would be used) would scare the daylights out of anyone and I think that you would evacuate into lifeboats before trying the tendering. All dependent on particular cicumstances, of course.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Bow_Rider
Traveler


Joined: 12/14/10
Posts: 901
Loc: SoCal
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: PelicanPirate]
      #1480936 - 02/16/13 12:26 PM (68.183.10.156)

Quote:

PelicanPirate said:
I think once at a certain point offshore, one onlyhas to have a macerator to offload the waste. I know the boat I was on actually treats the water to drinkable before turningit back to the ocean.

I would declare this an emergency and if brought to task, pay the fine.

I'm sure there will be some innovative solutions developed to prevent the PR of "bags".

Despite this, I'd take a free cruise to anywhere warm RIGHT NOW!

What if this had been a nude cruise --- that would have doubled the coverage




I don't know, it's one thing to macerate and dump a 15 gallon holding tank far enough off shore but when you are talking about what 3,000 people would generate I'm not sure there's a way to justify it dumping all that. There may well be some innovative solutions that come out of this but for now the bags serve their purpose when needed and I think most people would be able to handle it if they had a situation where using them was necessary. Hopefully nothing like this will happen again anytime soon! I'm happy everyone is finally back on land and wish them the best.

--------------------
**************************
Alison

Life is short, dance often.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ellen777
Traveler


Joined: 02/22/08
Posts: 504
Loc: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: Bow_Rider]
      #1481013 - 02/16/13 06:07 PM (184.0.22.32)

No - I have never tendered - have only been on one cruise and that was enough.
Thanks for the explanation - I was curious.
Ellen

--------------------
Life's a beach


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bbuchanan
Sponsor


Joined: 09/08/00
Posts: 529
Loc: Tucson, Arizona
Re: Carnival Triumph without propulsion power [Re: Carol_Hill]
      #1488664 - 03/08/13 03:11 PM (97.115.245.43)

Given I have been away from the board to a short while; I would like to weigh in on this event.

Not surprisingly, as with most issues of this sort, the Media uses it as an opportunity to dispense primarily negative reporting. CruiseOne, nationwide, had several passengers on the vessel and all report the problems were not quite as intense as reported in most outlets. Yes, the majority of the toilets were not operating but some were. Had input from many they were never offered an "onion" sandwich and there was plenty of food. In fact, one said they had lobster two days in a row.

With respect to tendering; that would be a liability far too great for any cruise line to undertake for safety purposes. The question has come up as to why they did not take passengers back to Mexico and the answer is over 1000 passengers had no passports. You cannot fly from a foreign country back to the States without a passport. (Makes the argument for everyone to get their passport.)

Finally, given four incidents with the Carnival brand in the last couple of years, I felt personally they made a conserted effort to make clients whole, all of wich were not required. Full reimbursement, absorbing all on board accounts, future cruise credit equal to the amount paid for the cruise, $500 cash and transportation back to the home port.

I'm sure some will disagree with me but wanted to add some thoughts to the situation.

--------------------
Best Regards,
Bonnie Buchanan,
Master Cruise Counselor
CruiseOne Tucson Arizona
www.cruiseone.com/bbuchanan


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | (show all)



Extra information
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      TTOLCode is enabled

Topic views: 4268

Jump to

Contact Us Terms of Use Advertising on TTOL Traveltalkonline