Forums39
Topics36,942
Posts295,185
Members26,393
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
37 registered members (WWII, Jaybird, cabokid, Sea_Skyman, davidandsusannj, daily2, KC2SXM, SXMScubaman, JimandBeth, bailau, ChiTownHarry, Wingman, GeorgeC1, 1Whale, ChuckG, road3682, George1234, Kmon, snuba, jagmansr, Nate C, bostonbob, Tonythepilot, Fran, SANFILIP, Kevin_B, duckfat, 10 invisible),
308
guests, and 75
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: flyingcloud]
#199570
07/08/2019 08:03 PM
07/08/2019 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 250 Okla
ScurvyD
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 250
Okla
|
We chartered a 2019 Lagoon 42 this year and loved it. I'm probably not as seasoned a sailor as most here, but I thought it handled and sailed great. The self tacking jib was a breeze, and you can really fine tune it with the car positions along the track. We probably averaged 6 to 9 knots. Didn't have to motor much, and ran the gen at night for air. Used about 44 gallons of fuel. You might get spoiled with only 5, as we were just 2 couples, and I'm not sure I could go back to 4 couples on a boat. A fly bridge would be nice to have, but I don't think you'll miss it too bad. We chartered with TMM, and there are a few owners here on the forum who have 42's and 450's there. They could give you a good report. Enjoy
I'd like to be a jelly fish, cause jelly fish don't pay rent.
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: flyingcloud]
#199615
07/09/2019 04:40 PM
07/09/2019 04:40 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 13 Kansas
flyingcloud
OP
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 13
Kansas
|
Thanks for the replies. Yes, the fly bridge was great and we spent a lot of time up there while sailing last year. We like to sail a lot and not just get to the next spot as quickly as possible so now I'm definitely conflicted! I can take or leave the self tacking jib, I have great crew so that isn't too important. We currently have a 4 cabin 42 booked with TMM (had a couple drop out), but there is a 3 cabin 450 that we could trade to, so I will have to discuss this with the crew. The other consideration is the 450 is a few years older, but TMM takes pretty good care of their boats so that probably isn't too much of a concern.
Last edited by flyingcloud; 07/09/2019 04:42 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: flyingcloud]
#199625
07/09/2019 07:11 PM
07/09/2019 07:11 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,142 Ontario, Canada
warren460
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,142
Ontario, Canada
|
The factory cushions while comfortable are not practical. If they get wet, they take forever to dry and they soak up the water. Not pleasant to sit on while wet.
Scuba doo has partial dodger windows to keep the fly relatively dry.
Last edited by warren460; 07/09/2019 07:12 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: flyingcloud]
#199671
07/10/2019 07:04 AM
07/10/2019 07:04 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 69 Hillsborough, NC
OceanSong
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 69
Hillsborough, NC
|
This is a great conversation. I think the Lagoon 450 is a fantastic boat. Our boat, Ocean Song, a 2019 Lagoon 42 owner's version is also in the TMM fleet. As great as the Lagoon 450 is, the Lagoon 42 is shattering Lagoon sales records for a reason. The 42 is on pace to pass the Lagoon 380 as Lagoon's most popular catamaran in another 2.5 years. The 380 has been in production for nearly two decades, the 42 - for three years! There is a reason the 42 is likely to become Lagoon's all-time most popular boat. Lagoon is now opening a new production line for the 42 due to its unparalleled popularity.
The 42 has the interior volume of a much larger boat, in fact, she feels more open and airy than the 450. Her more sleek styling is less boxy, square, and cumbersome than the 450. I know two current 450 owners who are now considering the 42 for their next boat. No doubt, due to its longer waterline and greater sail area, the 450 is a faster sailboat; however, the Lagoon 42 is a much easier boat to handle. Her reduced sail plan and self-tacking jib are perfect for stress-free sail handling and wonderful sailing! Don't think for one minute the 42 doesn't sail well, she does. In fact, we have been surprised at her turn of speed when the sails are well trimmed. The 42 hits the sweet spot for sailing catamarans!
Ocean Song, is a 2019 owner's version (3 cabins) with generator, gas grill, modified helm seat, AC, radar, AIS, microwave, 2 refrigerators, freezer, large Engel cockpit cooler, and Yanmar 57's. In September she will have underwater lights installed as well as SUP and Kayak racks.
Last edited by OceanSong; 07/10/2019 07:22 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: flyingcloud]
#199674
07/10/2019 07:28 AM
07/10/2019 07:28 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 893 Georgia & South Carolina
Deepcut
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 893
Georgia & South Carolina
|
I am currently on my Lagoon 42, Sea Tiger. which is also in TMM fleet.
In regards to space, Lagoon 450 does have somewhat more space. With 5, you will have plenty of space on the 42,
Speed is determined partially by length and the L450 is going to be faster by about 1 knot of so.
Self Tacking Jib is really nice when I am doing most of the sailing de facto single handedly.
Look for extras: A few boats in TMM have Watermakers... Very nice feature as we are 10 days into our trip and have not docked ANY for water... And crew is not in the water conserving mindset. (Having to stop for water can affect itinerary, as well as delaying for dock to open or waiting for others to leave dock. Just a couple of weeks ago, North Sound was without water, thus severely affecting those planning to sail to Anegada and needing a top off.)
Sea Tiger has 4 bean bag chairs which makes for great seats anywhere on the boat. Much better than factory cushions. (Our professional delivery captain loved them !).
Also Sea Tiger underwater lights as well as brackets for 2 Stand-Up Paddle boards, making them easier to stow and also out of the way of the deck.
And yes, TMM maintenance on the boats makes them the hands down choice.
One "draw back" of the Owner's Version(3 cabin) is that the owner's hull is so disproportionately bigger than either other stateroom, then the other guests may resent it. Just have a upfront method to dealing with this issue: Upon organizing trip "cabin assignment in order of commitment to trip (ie deposit received)" or lottery.
With your crew size, pick between the 42 and the 45, but note the extras.... especially Watermaker.
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: Deepcut]
#199707
07/10/2019 11:55 AM
07/10/2019 11:55 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 69 Hillsborough, NC
OceanSong
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 69
Hillsborough, NC
|
I am currently on my Lagoon 42, Sea Tiger. which is also in TMM fleet.
Look for extras: A few boats in TMM have Watermakers... Very nice feature as we are 10 days into our trip and have not docked ANY for water... And crew is not in the water conserving mindset. (Having to stop for water can affect itinerary, as well as delaying for dock to open or waiting for others to leave dock. Just a couple of weeks ago, North Sound was without water, thus severely affecting those planning to sail to Anegada and needing a top off.)
And yes, TMM maintenance on the boats makes them the hands down choice.
One "draw back" of the Owner's Version(3 cabin) is that the owner's hull is so disproportionately bigger than either other stateroom, then the other guests may resent it. Just have a upfront method to dealing with this issue: Upon organizing trip "cabin assignment in order of commitment to trip (ie deposit received)" or lottery. In the spirit of full disclosure: I know Deepcut and Sea Tiger well, crewed the delivery of Sea Tiger from Ft. Lauderdale to Tortola. Deepcut and I, along with many other TMM owners, communicate often about our boats. I agree that a watermaker is a very nice option, and we are looking into installing a watermaker on Ocean Song. I also agree that TMM's boat maintenance is the best in the BVI - hands down. However, I have to push back strongly about the owner's hull of the 3-cabin version being a "draw back". I think it's the primary reason many charterers prefer the 3-cabin version. We have had many families charter Ocean Song and the spacious master suite is a great feature, providing a degree of privacy and luxury for Mom and Dad one simply cannot get on a 4-cabin catamaran in the 40 - 50 foot range. Charterers are astonished by the open, airy feel, the storage, and added comfort as compared to the 4-cabin versions.The much larger and more functional owner's head and shower receive rave reviews. More and more charterers are now asking specifically for owner's versions. We have also found that couples chartering Ocean Song have much preferred the 3 cabin layout to their previous charters on boats with 4 cabins. As long as the charter group (not including professional skipper) is six or fewer, the owner's version is the way to go. I think any group chartering an owners version has worked out who gets the master suite well in advance. We understand the master suite to often be the "reward" for the charter organizers. Each time fellow sailors, charterers, and catamaran owners of 4-cabin models come aboard Ocean Song they express their jealousy of our master suite. They have nothing on their boats that can be called "suites", the 4-cabin models have cabins and heads. No one has indicated that it has been a draw back, except that it draws charters back for another charter on an owner's version! We specifically wanted an owner's version because we plan to live aboard in the future. Also, we felt it would attract more families and provide a level of comfort the 4-cabin version can't match. To date, we have been proven correct.
Last edited by OceanSong; 07/10/2019 11:58 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: flyingcloud]
#199709
07/10/2019 12:06 PM
07/10/2019 12:06 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 734 Redmond, WA
MrEZgoin
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 734
Redmond, WA
|
Not sure the info is accurate, but I was surprised by the low water tankage of the 42 when I was comparing 40 footers - something like 75 gallons while the others have 200.
M4000 "Lio Kai"
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: flyingcloud]
#199727
07/10/2019 02:48 PM
07/10/2019 02:48 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 734 Redmond, WA
MrEZgoin
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 734
Redmond, WA
|
MrEZgoin, Based on the specs on TMM's website, the L42 has 150gal water capacity and the L450 has 184gal.
Thanks, think I got it confused with the 400S2.
M4000 "Lio Kai"
|
|
|
Re: Lagoon 42 VS 450
[Re: Deepcut]
#199757
07/10/2019 07:14 PM
07/10/2019 07:14 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 893 Georgia & South Carolina
Deepcut
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 893
Georgia & South Carolina
|
One "draw back" of the Owner's Version(3 cabin) is that the owner's hull is so disproportionately bigger than either other stateroom, then the other guests may resent it. Just have a upfront method to dealing with this issue: Upon organizing trip "cabin assignment in order of commitment to trip (ie deposit received)" or lottery.
Ocean Song: I put quotation marks around "draw back" only to say owners version has one "Master Suite" and it is nice and even more spacious than the 4 cabin models... as intended. When chartering ANY boat, it is good to have system of assigning berths via lottery, order of deposits, or having variable rates for the various cabins. If Mom and Dad are with the kids, No problem.... MOM gets the owner's suite and Dad joins her there if she allows him.
|
|
|
|