BTB said:
When I last visited Biras Creek in February of this year, the entire resort was in extreme disrepair. What I can not understand is how Victor could lease a property of this value with out certain maintenance requirements in place to protect the owners interest. I am amazed that there has not been a lawsuit started to stop the decline and make the owner whole. Does anyone know why this has gone on for so long?
That would all come down to the actual lease contract, the entity that actually signed the lease, the jurisdiction and laws that that apply, and probably most important how much money and time are the harmed parties willing invest to get all the way to a judgement that can be collected on. I bet Victor would want to "settle" by buying the property at a discount?
