I suspect one could take the dissidents to court and vice versa. Many folks might not want to be named on either side of the suit. That was the case of a U.S. nudist resort that had a spat after decades amongst the original owners and their heirs.

Is that why we don’t here of either party taking the other to court ala francaise?

These dissidents, i don’t see where they ever prevail. The best I could see for them and any other reluctant rebuilder is to get their share of insurance proceeds and walk away.

Who are these cats and what could be their remaining motivation.

I see the point, they may want what martini indicates - a lower overhead club.......but it would never be free for them. Stuff (elect, water, security, etc) cost money.

The oBC shutdown, does put focus on the COPRO and the dissidents. Any dissidents out there reading this care to defend your honor in this situation?