Forums39
Topics38,629
Posts312,066
Members26,563
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
52 registered members (JandIrene, SXMNAN, Bernd, socamon, GeorgeC1, foreversxm, MrEZgoin, sunmantwo, caribbeangirl13, Jaybird, cbinparadise, Matt W, CaribbeanCanadians, SarahJane, davidandsusannj, mark37, Time Will Tell, jbutah, pedalpusher, nevar37, CdnCouple, JeanneB, IWIWSE, Kegoangoango, TC42, PML, Fletch, kaba, ndfaninnc, MKGrey, StMartinFan, JerseyPal, SirRichard, CottageGirl, RickG, Reid, Todd, Brent, BillB42, 13 invisible),
960
guests, and 116
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: AA--this is bizarre...
[Re: PnPinNC]
#205158
09/22/2019 11:49 AM
09/22/2019 11:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 705 South Coast of MA
SXMBND
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 705
South Coast of MA
|
I read it too... assuming this is the same one. Very interesting. Interesting to read the analysis and see how the media has sensationalized only one aspect, without taking the whole into account. ...and in doing so lead us all to believe the plane was airodynamically flawed - which it is NOT. Not saying that the drive to extend type ratings was good, but it is interesting to see the differences between Pilot centered design (Boeing), vs automation on the flight deck (Airbus). Here's the link: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/magazine/boeing-737-max-crashes.htmlGreat article.....thanks for posting.
|
|
|
|