Forums39
Topics38,612
Posts311,916
Members26,560
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
45 registered members (NumberCruncher, Alecs, JandIrene, Jspoone, anet_scot, BillDauterive, Matt W, Todd_Melinda_K, Kennys, MikeBiondo, barryvabeach, betsyg, deliveryskipper, Manpot, isleofpalms, Slug, davidandsusannj, SXMScubaman, kaba, hokiesailor, mark37, MrEZgoin, Fran, jazzgal, TC42, pbd007, onlymedication, Swifty, BillB42, VirginGordaResident, Todd, KirkB, 13 invisible),
990
guests, and 104
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: PCR test- nasal?
[Re: boucharda]
#246220
01/31/2021 05:06 PM
01/31/2021 05:06 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 162 Arlen, TX
BillDauterive
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 162
Arlen, TX
|
Method is irrelevant? Not according to the EHAS website: 12. The original result of the test must be uploaded as soon as possible as part of the health authorization application procedure in order to be processed. Processing can take up to 12 hours. The test result must clearly specify the name of the laboratory or clinic, full name of test subject, type of test administered, name of antigen test, swab date, source of the swab, result date and the result. Incomplete results, hand written or e-mail statements from doctors will not be accepted. (emphasis added) I'm not saying that a test result that lacks "source of swab" will be rejected. I'm merely reporting what the EHAS website states. And, yes, I realize that this is the same website that states that the test must be done within 72 hours, and later states that the time limit is 120 hours ...
|
|
|
|