Forums39
Topics38,724
Posts313,190
Members26,578
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
28 registered members (WWII, TRIM, MrEZgoin, SXMScubaman, eightzerobits, GeorgeC1, SXMBND, jaxon60, Lionsail, ARC, Sqdeese, CdnCouple, PML, Tom, JerseyPal, jenniboston, Deepcut, jbutah, Uksimonusa, SXMNAN, 8 invisible),
1,377
guests, and 93
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Almost GCBC story
[Re: Kathleen]
#56790
06/02/2015 02:35 PM
06/02/2015 02:35 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 155 Central Connecticut
4Driver4
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 155
Central Connecticut
|
Kathleen said: No criticism at all meant for kerrymarcie for booking through Expedia, but do you think GCBC would have cancelled the reservation if it was made directly through them instead of through a 3rd party? I'm just wondering who they decide to bump first? IMHO, booking through a third party just creates one more relay hop where something can get messed up, so it's possible that the issue was communication. Assuming that GCBC was oversold, it would make sense that third party reservations would get cut first, as the commission paid to the third party nets any hotel a lower nightly rate on the unit.
|
|
|
|