|
Forums39
Topics38,696
Posts312,830
Members26,572
| |
Most Online2,218
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
51 registered members (JandIrene, MrEZgoin, VirginGordaResident, boucharda, theaviationman, larryherb, Zanshin, SURICK, alecu7, GeorgeC1, StMartinFan, onlymedication, Instigator, jazzgal, Todd, ChiTownHarry, WWII, nevar37, SXMNAN, hokiesailor, kajunlady61, barryvabeach, RebeccaTN, DanandJanel, MNsnowbird, bailau, Time Will Tell, mark37, jbutah, lcote, RickG, Matt W, duckfat, ColoBoater, cbinparadise, Tom, SirRichard, 14 invisible),
1,381
guests, and 106
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: The Queen's phones
[Re: ruralcarrier]
#95856
04/26/2016 08:50 PM
04/26/2016 08:50 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,702
Newtown, CT
kim
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,702
Newtown, CT
|
ruralcarrier said:
It is not always about what is the "cheapest", especially if you need to be in touch with home or a business. When I get a smart phone I will get your mom to show me the ropes! Oh jeez!!! Good luck with that!!! <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/Wink.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
|
