|
|
|
Forums39
Topics40,783
Posts330,407
Members26,955
| |
Most Online4,095
Yesterday at 07:43 PM
|
|
|
Posts: 733
Joined: December 2005
|
|
|
10 members (sdefghjhgfdsadfgh, xrayman67, jrw, Billtjw, bailau, Tonythepilot, 4 invisible),
328
guests, and
303
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,420 Likes: 57
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,420 Likes: 57 |
|
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,296
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,296 |
The island has already lost 1 1/2 YEARS of revenue by not removing the wrecks in a more timely manner. Sailors have stayed away from SXM in droves because of the lagoon conditions. Insurance companies have redlined SXM by prohibiting their insured vessels from visiting. All because the government has not acted to clean up the obvious mess. It is very sad indeed.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 221
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 221 |
Would I be correct in saying that the owners of these vessels have already walked away from them? Assume that the owners had no insurance and hence have no way of paying for their removal? Would I also assume that any salvage cost will be billed to the owner? Despite being billed I assume the task of actually getting the money will be a task in itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
