|
|
|
Forums39
Topics40,582
Posts329,207
Members26,911
| |
Most Online4,031
Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
|
Posts: 202
Joined: February 2009
|
|
|
9 members (patentshark, Jerry_R, SXMScubaman, CaroleS, Standrea, RatmansWife, Manpot, 2 invisible),
321
guests, and
62
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,247 Likes: 26
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 18,247 Likes: 26 |
DH ARTICLEMost would say it is about time!
J.D.
|
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,969 Likes: 55
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,969 Likes: 55 |
Absolutely! This is good news!
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 3 |
Let's review what's been posted. Initially the airport filed a damage and business interruption claim for $125M or so. After much back and forth, mediaton and court decisions, the claim was settled for $71M (at least the damage part). World Bank and the Dutch government pledged $200M or so which is now signed for as noted in above article.
So a total of $271M or so to pay for damages of $71M as agreed settled in Court decision. Where does the difference of $200M go?
Hopefully most to other infrastructure repairs-- or in someones pocket.?
After 25 months since IRMA it still defies explanation! and the airport is not close to fixed.
No wonder the need for an Intregity Chamber
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
