Forums39
Topics38,810
Posts314,110
Members26,588
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
20 registered members (luvtotravel, steve74, marisol, eightzerobits, Nibj, Tom, deliveryskipper, IWIWSE, Fletch, boucharda, BillR, CharlieAndElaine, sugarae, 7 invisible),
1,336
guests, and 266
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Archaeological sites on St Martin
#203278
08/27/2019 01:25 PM
08/27/2019 01:25 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,909 Auburn, WA
SXMScubaman
OP
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,909
Auburn, WA
|
|
|
|
Re: Archaeological sites on St Martin
[Re: SXMScubaman]
#203362
08/28/2019 01:51 PM
08/28/2019 01:51 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 7
Colibri
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 7
|
There was no scoffing, only mild amusement. Just keep in mind, by defending this examination of artifacts as analysis of a Neolithic stage, like some long isolated tribe of Borneo, you have effectively dismissed the true advance of civilization for the region by some four millennia. The early passing for central America, Mexico, was 6000 BCE which they came upon independently or in some cases prior to the fertile crescent or more advanced tool adopters. The laggards went through more around 2000BCE for the western hemisphere. But hey, what ever earns you grant money, construction delay, historical designation brownie points, knock yourself out.
|
|
|
Re: Archaeological sites on St Martin
[Re: Colibri]
#203370
08/28/2019 02:21 PM
08/28/2019 02:21 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,044 Central Florida!
Carol_Hill
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,044
Central Florida!
|
Mercy, Colibri, you may well be right, but we are just a bunch of SXM lovers here. And the mistake (if there is one?? ) probably was by the Daily Herald, which ain't the Washington Post, if you get my drift.. This one is done..
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|