|
Forums39
Topics38,719
Posts313,136
Members26,578
| |
Most Online2,218
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
39 registered members (ColoBoater, Kennys, NumberCruncher, duckfat, Matt W, nevar37, MKGrey, Zanshin, TC42, Instigator, polaris, PML, marisol, Fitzhughlaw, Buddyhog, deliveryskipper, Brad_Va, pbd007, John, SXMScubaman, KirkB, Kevin_B, pandpfromcanada, dolfer, mark37, jbutah, Sunflower, steve74, SURICK, bailau, 9 invisible),
1,278
guests, and 81
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Grand Case beach?
[Re: Carol_Hill]
#74500
11/11/2015 10:31 AM
11/11/2015 10:31 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 993
Pittsburgh PA
plequerre
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 993
Pittsburgh PA
|
Carol_Hill said:
OK, thanks for the further clarification. "occupation" means something different than I thought it meant. Leaving room to be able to walk along the beach seems logical. Yep. In French, "occupied" means "not vacant" (for example for a bathroom) or "busy" (for a phone line). In the case of Grand Case beach, this decision prevents businesses from completely blocking the beach which I completely agree with, even if it might impact Calmos where we like to go eat at night.
|
|
|
|
