|
|
|
Forums39
Topics41,417
Posts336,801
Members27,478
| |
Most Online4,574
Jan 5th, 2026
|
|
|
Posts: 5,685
Joined: September 2006
|
|
|
12 members (ib4ut1, IowaFarmer, mchirgwin, Mike122, BHK, Caribob, CestLaVie, 5 invisible),
317
guests, and
178
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 27
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 27 |
|
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 85,827 Likes: 131
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 85,827 Likes: 131 |
OK, maybe interesting, but not technically about SXM, so will move this to People Talk.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,160
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,160 |
That does qualify as interesting, and it is a very busy, crowded beach.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 25
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 25 |
After reading this post on Friday (6-9) I was shocked to hear the story on a local Boston news radio station (WBZ)on Saturday. They omitted the portion about the "hands off" policy as they are a highly respected station. They indicated that the attorney general of the state will review the situation and provide a ruling.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 369
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 369 |
This country is too backwards to allow this for very long.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 501 Likes: 1
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 501 Likes: 1 |
That same weekend that the story came out, the OC city council had a emergency meeting to make going topless illegal. <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/duh.gif" alt="" />
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,706 Likes: 2
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,706 Likes: 2 |
Well my son spent the weekend in Ocean City MD. It was very crowded and he said he did not see any topless women (much to his dismay). <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/Yikes.gif" alt="" /> I think that's probably why he went there. LOL They may have ruled it illegal at that mtg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
