Forums39
Topics39,155
Posts317,401
Members26,627
|
Most Online3,182 07:18 AM
|
|
17 registered members (PML, cbinparadise, StMartinFan, JeanneB, GeorgeC1, pandpfromcanada, Manpot, 10 invisible),
2,065
guests, and 354
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: plequerre]
#68424
09/20/2015 09:17 AM
09/20/2015 09:17 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,753 Ohio
ruralcarrier
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,753
Ohio
|
I guess time will tell but I still think some parts of the construction in the pictures looks questionable.
J.D.
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: plequerre]
#68427
09/20/2015 11:23 AM
09/20/2015 11:23 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,753 Ohio
ruralcarrier
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,753
Ohio
|
SXM would be the last place I would expect any "special arrangements". <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/Wink.gif" alt="" /> <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/Wink.gif" alt="" />
J.D.
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: gotaluvit]
#68429
09/20/2015 06:41 PM
09/20/2015 06:41 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,753 Ohio
ruralcarrier
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,753
Ohio
|
Actually, not in my case. I make it to Orient about every other trip now.
J.D.
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: ruralcarrier]
#68431
09/21/2015 09:22 AM
09/21/2015 09:22 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 528 Charleston, SC
StMartinMike
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 528
Charleston, SC
|
These buildings SHOULD have been elevated at least five feet in the air, maybe more. I have built a home on the water and I am ten feet in the air. These building may survive a minor blow, but a real hurricane will leave nothing but the concrete slabs. Building in the air allows the tidal surge to pass under the structure, not beat it to toothpicks. If proper international hurricane standards are followed, raised structures can be built so survive 125 MPH winds. I hope hurricane straps, rafter and joist hangers, and metal roofs with proper fasteners are used on these buildings.
I know it is SXM, but building on a slab along the coast of the US would not be permitted nor could you get insurance. While I can see where the buildings will be stronger than the ones being replaced, they will not survive the rising ocean or a major hurricane.
"All of us have in our veins the exact same percentage of salt in our blood that exists in the ocean...And when we go back to the sea...we are going back from whence we came." >((((º>
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: NJHarry]
#68433
09/21/2015 04:04 PM
09/21/2015 04:04 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 969 Maine U.S.A.
Modi
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 969
Maine U.S.A.
|
NJHarry said: In looking at the construction of these buildings, the contractors are not following basic construction rules. Notice, all the 'headers' above doors and windows are not supported with jack studs. They are simply tacked (nailed) to the king stud. Headers are installed on jack studs to properly support the weight above and transfer the weight to the foundation. In this case, the headers and anything above (roof) is supported by nails only. The headers are also single beams vs doubled beams. .Notice the header above the very wide entrance way, there is no supporting studs holding up that header! That headers job is to support the roof above. Anyone with basic framing experience would not do this. Rules may be different in SXM, but this is very shoddy construction and would never pass any inspections in the US. I'm no construction expert, but you are correct about the headers being supported by literally nothing of substance, especially that big wide one... I would think it to be of such an expanse that even the upcoming roof load might bring it down?
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: Mantas]
#68434
09/21/2015 04:10 PM
09/21/2015 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 215 Michigan
mprevo
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 215
Michigan
|
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: mprevo]
#68435
09/21/2015 04:19 PM
09/21/2015 04:19 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564 Central Florida!
Carol_Hill
OP
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564
Central Florida!
|
Thanks for the pictures!! I'm not sure what I'm looking at--is that curvy thing going to be a sidewalk, in front of the wall or something??
Carol Hill
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: JohnandBev]
#68440
09/21/2015 05:09 PM
09/21/2015 05:09 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564 Central Florida!
Carol_Hill
OP
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564
Central Florida!
|
But the plans show a wall with a much larger curve to it, as opposed to this with the curves very close together??
Carol Hill
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: Modi]
#68442
09/21/2015 07:33 PM
09/21/2015 07:33 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 726 New Jersey
NJHarry
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 726
New Jersey
|
Modi said:NJHarry said: In looking at the construction of these buildings, the contractors are not following basic construction rules. Notice, all the 'headers' above doors and windows are not supported with jack studs. They are simply tacked (nailed) to the king stud. Headers are installed on jack studs to properly support the weight above and transfer the weight to the foundation. In this case, the headers and anything above (roof) is supported by nails only. The headers are also single beams vs doubled beams. .Notice the header above the very wide entrance way, there is no supporting studs holding up that header! That headers job is to support the roof above. Anyone with basic framing experience would not do this. Rules may be different in SXM, but this is very shoddy construction and would never pass any inspections in the US. I'm no construction expert, but you are correct about the headers being supported by literally nothing of substance, especially that big wide one... I would think it to be of such an expanse that even the upcoming roof load might bring it down? Modi - You are correct about that long header above the wide opening. Maybe they will install 'Teco' brackets on the posts for support. Or maybe there is another type of support we can't see. Proper training may not be available in SXM but I'm sure they are doing the best they can.
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: SXMScubaman]
#68445
09/22/2015 06:29 AM
09/22/2015 06:29 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 402
DavidinChelseaMA
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 402
|
SXMScubaman said: Yes, they probably are doing the best they can and I'm glad they are doing this. It's going to be a vast improvement over the hodg podg that was there before. I really preferred the more rustic look of the original structures. They had more of an "island feel." Too bad there wasn't some way that they could've recreated the original structures, using stronger materials. Oh, well. What's done is done, but feeling like I'm "off the beaten path" is what I like about certain beaches on the island. With these new buildings, that feeling is gone on this stretch of Orient.
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: plequerre]
#68447
09/22/2015 08:10 AM
09/22/2015 08:10 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564 Central Florida!
Carol_Hill
OP
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564
Central Florida!
|
Since they started in June, they will be finished in October then. Huhm....
Carol Hill
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: TravelHat]
#68449
09/22/2015 09:11 AM
09/22/2015 09:11 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564 Central Florida!
Carol_Hill
OP
Traveler
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83,564
Central Florida!
|
Actually, that was kind of what I meant. They seem very far from where they should be, if they are going to be finished in four months.
Carol Hill
|
|
|
Re: Orient pictures from Bill 9730
[Re: Carol_Hill]
#68450
09/22/2015 09:46 AM
09/22/2015 09:46 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 993 Pittsburgh PA
plequerre
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 993
Pittsburgh PA
|
Carol_Hill said: Actually, that was kind of what I meant. They seem very far from where they should be, if they are going to be finished in four months. I agree and I was just commenting on the "delais: 4 mois" mentioned on the billboard. It looks like the main construction and connections to the grid were to be completed in 4 months, allowing interior work to start.
|
|
|
|