Forums39
Topics38,680
Posts312,672
Members26,570
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
46 registered members (jbutah, nevar37, NoelHall, OceanSong, RickG, socamon, RebeccaTN, Matt W, Rbailey, Time Will Tell, tpcook, polaris, SteveH, tmsxmsails, PML, steve74, JandIrene, pandpfromcanada, n1gdo, Bernd, GeorgeC1, Kevin_B, SXMScubaman, MrEZgoin, Buddyhog, Brian&Andi, stangied, cbinparadise, caribbeangirl13, hokiesailor, KirkB, Fitzhughlaw, Eva, 13 invisible),
1,293
guests, and 105
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: About the Dink
[Re: rhans]
#17952
11/20/2012 05:56 PM
11/20/2012 05:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,336 Port St Lucie, FL
Richieg1g
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,336
Port St Lucie, FL
|
rhans said: Your comments are a perfect analogy on the two stroke vs four stroke but don’t blame Mercury as Tohatsu builds the Four Strokes for them. As you said Four Strokes are extremely cold blooded. To meet California’s star rating the factory sets them real lean. Imagine them in a colder climate, a lot of my customers break the tamper proof plug and richen the low speed on the carb just to keep there sanity. Heavy, you bet, slow to plane, yep, which results in your fuel consumption analogy. It takes “X” number of units of fuel to provide “Y” number of BTU’s to make “Z” number of H.P. Giving that it takes H.P. to plane the dinghy and to over come the weight increase and the performance decrease the throttle has to maintain a higher setting, hence, more fuel used. Give me a stinky two stoke any day. This past summer we had a rental from the Moorings during the dinghy poker run at Leverick Bay. It had a 9.8hp Tohatsu that was a real oinker. The 15hp Yamaha on our regular dinghy was a rocket in comparison and the 2-stroke Yamaha always started on the first or second pull. A much better option.
|
|
|
|