The judge did not grant injunctive relief to the owners, thereby allowing the new Alegria owners to proceed with moving forward with their new resort. That did not, however, mean that the matter was over or that Alegria other involved parties were blameless or will not ultimately be found liable. The injunctive relief was an "emergency" type of action to allow people to continue to use timeshares in the high season. It did not go to the merits of the overall underlying potential case which could involve more than one party or entity. Whether that will be pursued, or be successful, is not yet determined. But I do not want to go into further detail at this point. I just wanted to clarify that the original suit was purely an emergency injunctive action to try to help people who were being displaced.