|
Forums39
Topics39,176
Posts317,614
Members26,630
| |
Most Online3,676
01:00 PM
|
|
|
20 registered members (BlueMoc, SXMScubaman, Manpot, WWII, phustad711, JeanneB, KirkB, fabila, SXMbeacher, Kennys, BillS, charlie, deliveryskipper, justaroofer, 6 invisible),
3,112
guests, and 335
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Timeshare law must be in Dutch
[Re: SXMWendell]
#36499
01/27/2015 11:37 AM
01/27/2015 11:37 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 993
Pittsburgh PA
plequerre
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 993
Pittsburgh PA
|
They're called Timeshare ACTION Committee? Really? <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/Yikes.gif" alt="" /> "The Timeshare Action Committee had discussions about plotting the way forward since the 1990s". <sarcasm off>
|
|
|
Re: Timeshare law must be in Dutch
[Re: dane]
#36501
01/27/2015 02:15 PM
01/27/2015 02:15 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,677
Brookfield, CT.
pat
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,677
Brookfield, CT.
|
I was thinking the same thing, Dane, and I can't see why this should be such a problem beyond the simple fact of it being one more delaying tactic for them to fall back on. I mean, I get why they might want it to be in Dutch but why not with an English counterpart? <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/handshake.gif" alt="" /> <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/handshake.gif" alt="" />
Respectfully,
pat
"Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat
them."
|
|
|
|
