|
Forums39
Topics38,628
Posts312,056
Members26,563
| |
Most Online2,218
Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
|
42 registered members (steve74, OceanSong, Kennys, Fran, NumberCruncher, magpie, Fitzhughlaw, MrEZgoin, GeorgeC1, George1234, BlueMoc, ColoBoater, fabila, Sea_Skyman, JeanneB, pburke40, Jspoone, Rbailey, dolfer, Reid, sugarae, duckfat, bostonbob, KirkB, bbeach, toast, cbf, RonDon, MKGrey, Leagle49, Beansbbq, mahokid, 10 invisible),
824
guests, and 113
spiders. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Boatyball increase
[Re: jagmansr]
#291802
11/29/2022 04:57 PM
11/29/2022 04:57 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 823
Redmond, WA
MrEZgoin
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 823
Redmond, WA
|
Thanks Tom!
Certainly a good point about the impact of anchoring, then it also behooves the people who decide such things to strike a balance between protecting the seabed and milking the cash cow. I assume the assignment of leases gives them some leverage on the fees charged. They could also think about the now $15 premium charged by BB and how many skippers will choose to anchor due to that. Few things are infinitely price elastic.
M4000 "Lio Kai"
|
|
|
|
