Carol_Hill said:
As martini stated is her response, the video was taken on PEDRO'S property. So, while the video was taken on Club O property, because Club O owns Pedro's property, it wasn't taken on Club O property, where the security guards patrol.
Honestly, these days, everyone has a cell phone that is capable of taking video and/or pictures. Club O does a decent job of preventing pictures on their property. However, with cell phones and even drones these days, whether it is legal or not or acceptable or not, if you're on a nude beach, you have to be prepared for the possibility that someone is going to take a picture or a video of you. Would I like it if a video showed up of me on Club O beach?? No. And I would think the person was pretty desperate, for taking video of me at Club O. But if the video were one like this one, where you basically don't even SEE the people in the background unless someone calls your attention to it, there's no way I would call attention to myself being in the video. If someone was taking pictures into my back yard, that's one thing. But on a public nude beach? It's hard for me to get too worked up about it.
Then why have a no photo policy at all if it is your premise that it should be expected you will be photographed if you are nude on a nude beach. That might hold water on a non C/O beach but not here. There is a reasonable expectation of privacy here as evidenced by Club O's policy and the Collective's support of it.Point a camera at my wife and you will understand very quickly how she feels about her privacy and your lack of respect for it. Not you personally Carol but the photographer. I am a little surprised by your position being a friend of Sugerae as we were as well and know first-hand what she had to say about this subject. <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/handshake.gif" alt="" />
