Forums39
Topics38,568
Posts311,463
Members26,550
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
14 registered members (WWII, tmsxmsails, beachy, Alltech63, Jerry_R, Fitzhughlaw, George1234, Todd_Melinda_K, Midsouth, TravelHat, 4 invisible),
857
guests, and 71
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: fcpc48]
#190081
04/08/2019 09:48 AM
04/08/2019 09:48 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 18,574 St Maarten
BillandElaine
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 18,574
St Maarten
|
Yes, it's recovered beautifully.
Elaine ********************************* God Bless the broken road....
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: fcpc48]
#190083
04/08/2019 09:59 AM
04/08/2019 09:59 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 18,574 St Maarten
BillandElaine
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 18,574
St Maarten
|
Yes, Dany has a lovely set up there.
Elaine ********************************* God Bless the broken road....
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: SXMScubaman]
#190101
04/08/2019 12:30 PM
04/08/2019 12:30 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,645 Brookfield, CT.
pat
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,645
Brookfield, CT.
|
Never has been officially or legally but people do it anyway. Legal? Who knows? Is it technically ‘legal’ anywhere on the island? My first trip to SXM was in November 1973. Cupecoy was the ONLY Dutch side beach that was widely accepted as being a clothing optional beach then and there has been no change in that status to this day. With lots of development in the area many have tried to change this but still nothing to effect the C.O. status to this time.
Last edited by pat; 04/08/2019 12:32 PM.
Respectfully,
pat
"Always keep your words soft and sweet, just in case you have to eat them."
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: pat]
#190108
04/08/2019 12:54 PM
04/08/2019 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,701 Auburn, WA
SXMScubaman
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,701
Auburn, WA
|
Never has been officially or legally but people do it anyway. Legal? Who knows? Is it technically ‘legal’ anywhere on the island? My first trip to SXM was in November 1973. Cupecoy was the ONLY Dutch side beach that was widely accepted as being a clothing optional beach then and there has been no change in that status to this day. With lots of development in the area many have tried to change this but still nothing to effect the C.O. status to this time. I believe Club O was designated a legal CO beach before Irma. Not sure of status now since there is no operating Club O anymore.
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: Snorkeller]
#190117
04/08/2019 03:58 PM
04/08/2019 03:58 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,302 Vancouver, WA
Todd
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,302
Vancouver, WA
|
With a light chuckle, is this where somebody states "illegal is illegal" ? It is my favorite phrase if only to see when and where it is applied and when and where it is ignored based on personal preference and beliefs.
I am a big time supporter of Dany, all those that enjoy Cupecoy, and I hope that Club O for all those that enjoy that area of Orient get it back as good or better than before. This from a "textile" that has a lot of CO friends. But then again, I was rooting for Gus at Baie Rouge as well so......
Cheers!
I prefer the Isle seat
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: fcpc48]
#190167
04/09/2019 12:23 PM
04/09/2019 12:23 PM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 552 Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
KGB
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 552
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
I think the legality of nudity is the least of worry now for the island government. Naked people are usually very friendly and do not carry any weapons...They should worry more about illigal guns and gangs and especially the idiots who are preying on visitors...
"Often Wrong, Never in Doubt"
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: Second_To_N0ne]
#195482
05/21/2019 09:53 AM
05/21/2019 09:53 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,515 Ohio
ruralcarrier
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,515
Ohio
|
Just because it happens does not mean it is "accepted" or "legal".
J.D.
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: fcpc48]
#195490
05/21/2019 11:24 AM
05/21/2019 11:24 AM
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 552 Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
KGB
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 552
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
|
Been topless for a women is accepted pretty much everywhere, even here in Canada, lol! On the island of SXM, all beaches are totally ok with a lady been topless. Been nude is different. Only a few beaches like Cupecoy, Orient and a far part of Baie Ruge will be ok for going naked. And don’t be surprised seen topless ladies on the island. And don’t be surprised if your wife will surprise you one day by taking her top off!
"Often Wrong, Never in Doubt"
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: islandgem]
#195492
05/21/2019 11:59 AM
05/21/2019 11:59 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081 Clearwater, FL
Biturbo
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,081
Clearwater, FL
|
Thank you KGB & Elizabeth. Well stated - there are much worse things on the island to fret over than a nude person on the beach.
I'm going where the weather suits my clothes.
|
|
|
Re: Cupecoy Beach
[Re: Second_To_N0ne]
#195555
05/22/2019 09:53 AM
05/22/2019 09:53 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,515 Ohio
ruralcarrier
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 17,515
Ohio
|
Just because it happens does not mean it is "accepted" or "legal".
I'm just sharing what we were told - it was our first trip to the island. Can't wait to go back!!!!
No problem. It is always humorous to see someone who tries this "accepted/legal" topless stuff on Anguilla. It is usually addressed posthaste and is not tolerated, at least in public.
J.D.
|
|
|
|