|
Forums39
Topics40,345
Posts327,249
Members26,839
| |
Most Online4,031
Dec 15th, 2024
|
|
|
Posts: 218
Joined: January 2003
|
|
|
8 members (SarahJane, GeorgeC1, SXMScubaman, RonDon, Kennys, MGA, 2 invisible),
491
guests, and
70
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
 .
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,627 Likes: 8
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,627 Likes: 8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,171 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,171 Likes: 4 |
That's what happened on Monday x 3 but at least then there was a storm to blame. Yesterday was pretty nice...strange
Video looks like the aircraft actually touched down and then aborted
Last edited by boucharda; 01/21/2023 07:46 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,698 Likes: 42
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,698 Likes: 42 |
boucharda--I could be wrong, but isn't that what a "touch and go" is?
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 235 Likes: 5
Traveler
|
|
OP
Traveler
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 235 Likes: 5 |
Yeah, Carol. If the wheels don't touch it's called a "low pass." And typically both low-pass and touch-and-go are done for three reasons:
- Pilot in training, practicing approach and/or landing.
- When the PIC (pilot in command) misjudges the approach and is concerned that there isn't sufficient runway remaining to stop the aircraft before the end of the runway.
- PIC sees an obstruction on the runway, and decides to abort the landing.
For the AF flight, I think it's the second one. Actually, hope it's the second one!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,171 Likes: 4
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,171 Likes: 4 |
boucharda--I could be wrong, but isn't that what a "touch and go" is? Correct...my "Duh"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,698 Likes: 42
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 84,698 Likes: 42 |
Carol Hill
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 79 Likes: 1
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 79 Likes: 1 |
Looked like a go-around to me; a touch and go I understand to be planned, I doubt this was. When I have watched Air France land the wheels usually touch down bang on the target, i.e. pretty much lined up with the PAPI (red lights), the video of the first attempt shows the touch down point significantly past there, my guess is that's why they went around. Maybe the crew judged that another ton of Jet A burned in a go-around was better than hot brakes from landing long? Thanks for posting anyway, always interesting to watch things at PJIA! Dave.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 31 Likes: 1
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 31 Likes: 1 |
I was standing on the stairs to board my Delta flight at the south end of the terminal, when Air France attempted the landing. I did not see the wheels touch the ground prior to the pilot applying power for the go around. Looking at Goole Earth, the black marks on the runway mostly end at gate 2. My WAG was he was a little long on the touch down and aborted.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,105 Likes: 39
Traveler
|
|
Traveler
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,105 Likes: 39 |
Something we'll never know for sure what happened but at least it wasn't a news worthy issue.
|
|
|
|
|
.
