Forums39
Topics38,689
Posts312,738
Members26,570
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
45 registered members (polaris, ColoBoater, SteveH, SXMScubaman, bkigar, jbutah, Tom, Kennys, cbf, dolfer, luvtotravel, Bernd, ndfaninnc, Fitzhughlaw, JoninNC, eightzerobits, JeanneB, Sunflower, PML, Jaybird, MrEZgoin, Lexington14, cabokid, boucharda, drk, MrTim-BTV, Kevin_B, GeorgeC1, KirkB, NumberCruncher, MNsnowbird, Sunnysideup, Scubacat, lcote, steve74, 10 invisible),
1,305
guests, and 97
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: Pre-Clearance Controversy?
[Re: kim]
#204427
09/12/2019 06:06 PM
09/12/2019 06:06 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 144
Tammy
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 144
|
Exactly!!! With the advent of global entry and mobile passport this is a giant waste of money that could be spent elsewhere. Now if the US was footing the bill then that’s different. But if SXM is paying it should NOT be a priority at this point. I agree completely with both these statements. And this is not rocket science just good old common sense, seems common sense isn't so common after all in government.
Be the person your dog thinks you are 💫
|
|
|
|