Forums39
Topics38,713
Posts313,048
Members26,576
|
Most Online2,218 Jan 21st, 2020
|
|
42 registered members (bailau, warren460, Todd, ColoBoater, jaxon60, BillB42, cbf, fabila, jagmansr, JeanneB, xrayman67, jazzgal, IWIWSE, pony600, Zanshin, jrw, lcote, SXMbeacher, dolfer, onlymedication, BHK, Manpot, anet_scot, Chargergirl, tomralnc, Uksimonusa, PML, WLE, Scubacat, StMartinFan, skipdastraw, richard4th, MrEZgoin, jbutah, 8 invisible),
429
guests, and 118
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Re: AA--this is bizarre...
[Re: SXMScubaman]
#205141
09/22/2019 07:15 AM
09/22/2019 07:15 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 226
PnPinNC
Traveler
|
Traveler
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 226
|
I read it too... assuming this is the same one. Very interesting. Interesting to read the analysis and see how the media has sensationalized only one aspect, without taking the whole into account. ...and in doing so lead us all to believe the plane was airodynamically flawed - which it is NOT. Not saying that the drive to extend type ratings was good, but it is interesting to see the differences between Pilot centered design (Boeing), vs automation on the flight deck (Airbus). Here's the link: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/magazine/boeing-737-max-crashes.html
Last edited by PnPinNC; 09/22/2019 07:21 AM.
|
|
|
|