That "emergency" relief offered in Alegria's initial emailed and very confusing letter (1) was not seen or received by everyone, and even if it was, it (2) forced people to relinquish any potential claim without having any facts behind what happened, and (3) did not guarantee same size units or anything at all really. So it was not "emergency relief", it was giving up.

So a group of affected people who knew of what was going on tried to get a stay on the "ejection" and eliminations of timeshare rights until they could look at what had led to the whole situation and determine who, if anyone, was at fault. The situation was very confusing and unclear and very open to the possibility of fraud or collusion and people were (and are) investigating. The injunctive relief stopping the "termination" of rights was not granted, but it did not stop the injured parties from investigating whether there is any other form of relief, and it does not stop them from investigating whether there was any wrongdoing on the part of Manek, Endless Vacations, Sidhom, Alegria, the bank, or another other parties. There may or may not be fault. There may or may not be economic relief. There may or may not be collectible damages. But the right to look into this is something that anyone should have and pursue if they so desire, even if the only result is to raise awareness or stop it from happening to others.