Remembering the original discussion about this, and the letters so many of us penned in opposition to jet ski rentals there, that's what I was wondering, too. This article said nothing about jet skis and I never did hear a final outcome of all that but we all know how it works - start out with fins, snorkels and kayaks and pretty soon jet skis appear as well. But that's another discussion, isn't it?!

We've always understood the Ansary family owned all the property including the roads and parking lot between the golf course and the tree line at Mullet Beach so I don't get how a permit could be allowed but if one was, WHERE? Do you remember all the fuss over Jorritt's foundation on Simpson Bay Beach? Supposedly, no permanent structures of any sort could be placed on the beach by anyone. Wouldn't that apply to all the beaches?

Clearly, you can't pour concrete footings on someone else's property if they're saying this was done on Mullet land.

And the other thing that confused me a bit was trying to figure out if the gentleman who holds the license in question actually sat on the board that allowed these licenses to be granted in the first place and then once the granting of licenses was approved, did he leave the board and get one? <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/handshake.gif" alt="" /> <img src="http://www.traveltalkonline.com/forums/images/graemlins/handshake.gif" alt="" />