Ok...I get your interpretation..but...the article states the court ruled in favor of those 17 owners and the TOCA members. Out of the 2200 TS owners it states that only 62 are members of the organization represented in the suit
TOCA was established in October 2014. Representing 62 of its members, who together claim to have lost $1.5 million in advance rent payments, TOCA called on the Court to grant its members access to their apartments.
Does the ruling only apply to those 62?
